Academic Conferences & Call for Abstracts
Manage Call for Abstracts Without Chasing Reviewers
Structured submission tracks and remote peer review, built for academic and research programs.
Abstract review breaks down fast when submissions arrive by email and reviewers grade from disconnected PDFs. Judgify gives conference organizers a single system for collecting research submissions into defined tracks and routing them to peer reviewers who grade remotely on a secure dashboard.
Start FreeSee How Review Works
COMPLIANCE CARDS
GDPR Compliant
Applicant and participant data handled under EU data
protection standards
PDPA Compliant
Coverage for programs collecting data from Asia-Pacific
participants
Cookie Policy
Transparent tracking disclosures on every public-facing page
Data Retention Policy
Configurable retention windows for applicant and participant records
ISO 27001 Certified
Independently audited information security management
Use cases
Built for way research programs actually run.
Academic Conferences
Multi-track call for abstracts with track-specific reviewer pools
Medical & Scientific Symposiums
Blind peer review for research integrity
Professional Association Conferences
Structured submission windows with
automated reviewer assignment
Recurring Annual Conferences
Clone last year’s tracks and criteria for the next cycle
Four-Step Process
How It Works for the Entrant
Organizers define submission tracks that match their conference's subject areas, then publish a call for abstracts with clear eligibility and formatting requirements. Authors submit directly into the correct track, and Judgify routes each abstract to assigned peer reviewers, who score and comment through a secure remote dashboard. Program committees see consolidated reviewer feedback in one place, rather than piecing decisions together from scattered files.
Define Submission Tracks
Sort abstracts by subject area automatically at intake
Collect Research Submissions
Authors upload abstracts and supporting materials through a structured form
Route to Peer Reviewers
Automated or manual assignment based on track and reviewer expertise
Consolidate Decisions
Aggregate reviewer feedback and scores for program committee sign-off
OUR CORE VALUES
Core Values for the Entrant Experience
Every feature, every decision, every line of support comes back to these four commitments.
Transparency
Every score, comment, and decision is tracked and auditable
Security Compliance
ISO 27001 and PCI DSS certified, built on AWS infrastructure with 99.9% uptime
Global Accessibility
80 languages and 27 currencies for programs running anywhere
Fair Evaluation
Structured rubrics and blind-review options remove bias from the judging process
Faq’s
Frequently Asked Questions
Can reviewers stay anonymous to authors?
Yes. Blind and double-blind review configurations are supported.
Does Judgify handle conference registration or scheduling?
No. Judgify manages abstract intake and review. Registration and session scheduling are handled outside the platform.
Can reviewers access submissions remotely?
Yes. The reviewer dashboard is fully web-based, no downloads or local software required
Can we run multiple submission tracks at once?
Yes. Each track can have its own reviewer pool, criteria, and deadlines.
Contact Team
Ready to simplify your next call for abstracts?
Judgify is awards management software that gets you live fast, keeps things simple, and treats every program like it matters. Try it free and see how long setup actually takes.
Start FreeTalk to Sales